Deductly vs ChatGPT

Why not just ask ChatGPT?

ChatGPT is fast and free. It is also wrong about Canadian funding more often than business owners realize. In a representative test in June 2026 it recommended CDAP (a $15k grant that closed to new applicants in February 2024), quoted CanExport at $99,999 (the 2026-27 cap was cut to $50,000), and invented an Ontario program that does not exist. Three of ten matches were actively wrong. For money you have to apply for, that is the kind of mistake that costs you weeks.

Feature
ChatGPT
Deductly
Program accuracy
Hallucinates plausible-sounding programs that do not exist
314 real Canadian programs, each linked to its official source and dated
Active vs closed status
No idea CDAP closed in 2024 or what replaced it
Live status, last-verified date on every program
Dollar amounts
Quotes outdated caps from training data
Current caps from the issuing agency, with the source
Eligibility rules
Generic advice
Strict structured rules per program: type, industry, province, size, age
The last mile
No documents, no steps, no draft
Apply Pack: eligibility line by line, document checklist, ordered steps, a first-draft application
Application links
May 404 or point at the wrong page
Live URL or honest "verify with the issuing org" flag if it broke
For your accountant
No
A hand-off report, and an early-access track for firms to run this across every client
Speed to a usable list
You have to know what to ask
10 questions, 3 minutes, ranked list

The accuracy test · June 2026

We ran the test. Here is the receipt.

One realistic business owner's question, run against a general AI model in June 2026, then checked program by program against the official sources. Of 10 programs it returned, 3 were clean, 4 were real but flawed, and 3 were actively wrong.

The prompt

I run a 6-person software/SaaS company incorporated 2 years ago in Ontario, about $400k revenue, we do some R&D and want to start exporting. What Canadian government grants and tax credits do we qualify for?

  • CDAP (Canada Digital Adoption Program)Actively wrong

    Model said: Recommended a $15,000 grant plus a $100k loan.

    Verified: CDAP stopped accepting applications on Feb 19, 2024. No new applicants, no direct federal replacement. Acting on it wastes hours on a dead program.

  • "Ontario Small Business Innovation Grant"Actively wrong

    Model said: Listed it as a real program.

    Verified: No standing federal or Ontario program by this name exists. This is a plausible-sounding confabulation.

  • CanExport SMEsActively wrong

    Model said: Quoted up to $99,999.

    Verified: The program is open, but the 2026-27 maximum was cut to $50,000. The model quotes the old cap, off by nearly 2x.

  • SR&EDReal but flawed

    Model said: "Up to 35% refundable".

    Verified: Real and current, but the 35% refundable rate applies to CCPCs on the first tranche of qualified spend. Stated as a blanket rate it misleads.

  • FuturpreneurReal but flawed

    Model said: Recommended without conditions.

    Verified: Real, but age-capped (typically 18 to 39). Recommended without checking the founder’s age, so it can be a false match.

  • Student Work Placement / Canada Summer JobsReal but flawed

    Model said: "You qualify".

    Verified: Both real, but deadline-driven with intake windows the model cannot know in real time. "You qualify" is useless without "the window is open until [date]".

  • Women Entrepreneurship StrategyReal but flawed

    Model said: Suggested it.

    Verified: Real federal strategy, but eligibility is demographic-specific and was recommended without confirming it applies.

  • NRC IRAPReal and current

    Model said: Funding plus advisory for innovation.

    Verified: Real and current. The model omits that it is advisor-gated (you need an Industrial Technology Advisor, not a simple apply), but the program is right.

  • MitacsReal and current

    Model said: Subsidized research interns.

    Verified: Real and current research-internship funding. A good call.

  • OIDMTC (Ontario Interactive Digital Media)Real and current

    Model said: Listed for a SaaS company.

    Verified: The credit is real, though eligibility (interactive digital media) is narrower than "any SaaS". The model over-broadens it.

In fairness

For a quick sense of what is out there, a general model is genuinely useful and free, and several of its answers here were real. Deductly only earns its place when you need programs that are correct, currently open, and actually claimable. That is exactly where the model fails, and where money is on the line.

How to reproduce it

Paste the prompt above into a current general AI model, then check each program against its official source. Count the closed programs, invented programs, and stale caps. We re-run this when programs or caps change.

Sources
What "verified" means here

Verified means we re-check the program against its official source, confirm it is still open, and confirm the facts that change, the dollar caps and the deadlines, then stamp the date you see on it. It is a source re-check, not a CPA sign-off, and we say so.

  • The freshness numbers on this site are generated from the live data on every build.
  • An automated job re-checks every source URL and snapshots each program’s cap, deadline, and status. We publish the date of the last run rather than promise a cadence. Drift opens a review issue; when a canonical page is gone we fall back to the issuing organization and flag it.
  • Programs that have ended are marked closed and are never recommended, only kept as reference pages.

See the live freshness audit on the data quality page.

When ChatGPT is the right tool

ChatGPT is great for drafting a cover letter, summarizing a long document, or thinking through structure. It is the wrong tool for "which Canadian program am I eligible for and how much could I get." That is what Deductly does.

See it for yourself.

Take the 3-minute quiz. You will know in under 5 minutes whether Deductly is worth it for your business.

See a real list in 3 minutes